High-Intensity Endurance exercice program for Parkinson's Disease
Health Problem : Risk of fall
Designation
Abbreviation
Category
Main Indication
How does it work?
Other Benefits
- Improved balance and mobility.
- Improved grip strength.
- Improved cognitive function (working memory, attention, and processing speed).
- Improved mood (reduction in symptoms of depression and anxiety).
- Better sleep quality.
- Improved quality of life
Direct Risks
- Falls.
- Freezing (temporary, involuntary inability to move, usually affecting the legs).
- Orthostatic hypotension (drop in blood pressure upon standing or after exertion, which may cause dizziness or a fall).
- Rare cardiovascular complications.
- Rare respiratory complications (oxygen desaturation or shortness of breath during prolonged exertion).
- Functional decompensation.
- Pain in the tendons or muscles.
Risks of interaction
- Sedatives or anxiolytics may reduce exercise tolerance and increase the risk of falls.
Contraindications
- Advanced stage of the disease and significant functional limitations preventing the patient from reaching the intended intensity during the session.
- Severe cognitive impairment
- Severe cardiorespiratory comorbidities (heart failure, unstable COPD).
- Autonomic nervous system disorders, such as a drop in blood pressure upon standing, causing dizziness.
- Significant muscle or joint pain or bone fragility that limits movement.
- Severe and unstable involuntary movements (marked dyskinesias).
- Significant lack of energy or motivation, untreated depression.
- High-risk anticoagulant therapy or history of bleeding.
- Lack of family or logistical support, making it difficult to participate in the program.
Duration
Sessions per week
Precautions
- A preliminary medical evaluation must be conducted (cardiopulmonary, ENT if necessary) and a stress test performed if risk factors are present.
- The program must begin in the presence of a physical therapist trained to adjust the intensity and ensure safety.
- Sessions are scheduled during the “ON” period whenever possible, and the patient brings their day/night self-assessment log.
- Blood pressure and heart rate are measured before and after the first week, then periodically thereafter.
- Identify and document signs of orthostatic hypotension, dizziness, dyskinesias, and other motor complications.
- Stay hydrated in the event of orthostatic hypotension, including after exercise.
- Stop immediately in the event of chest pain.
- Break up the exercise into shorter intervals in the event of respiratory desaturation.
- Monitor for and report warning signs (excessive shortness of breath, chest pain, dizziness, pallor, hemoptysis, or hoarseness) to stop immediately and seek medical evaluation.
- Ensure an emergency plan is in place with established local protocols, medical contacts, and access to a defibrillator if necessary.
Regulatory provisions
This practice must be performed by a professional trained at the INM for people with Parkinson's disease, in a healthcare facility, even if some sessions are conducted at home and others are supervised remotely.
Main Initiator
Author(s) of the Sheet
NPIS (comité scientifique)Revision Date : 14/04/2026
Version : V01
Download the sheet in PDF format
Designation
Abbreviation
Category
Main Health benefit
ICD : 8400.0
Explanation
Routine Test
Threshold
Part I: Non-motor activities of daily living (13 items). A score of 10 or less corresponds to a mild disability, 22 or more to a severe disability.
Part II: Motor activities of daily living (13 items). A score of 12 or less corresponds to a mild disability, 30 or more to a severe disability.
Part III: Motor examination (18 items). A score of 32 or less corresponds to a mild disability, 59 or more to a severe disability.
Part IV: Motor complications (6 items). A score of 4 or less corresponds to a mild form, 13 or more to a severe form.
Minimal Clinically Important Change
Secondary benefits
- Improved balance and mobility (Arcolin 2016; de Almeida 2022; Kóra 2025).
- Improved grip strength (Jansen 2021).
- Improved cognitive function (working memory, attention, and processing speed), partly through increased neurotrophic factors and cerebral perfusion (Luthra 2025).
- Improved mood (reduction in depressive and anxiety symptoms).
- Better sleep quality.
- Improved quality of life (Ernst 2024).
Direct Risks
- Falls.
- Freezing (temporary, involuntary inability to move, usually affecting the legs).
- Orthostatic hypotension (drop in blood pressure upon standing or after exertion, which may cause dizziness or a fall).
- Rare cardiovascular complications.
- Rare respiratory complications (oxygen desaturation or dyspnea during prolonged exertion).
- Functional decompensation.
- Tendinous and muscular pain.
Risks of interaction
- Exercise can alter gastric emptying and splanchnic circulation, influencing the onset of the drug’s effect; therefore, the ON/OFF status around exercise sessions must be documented to interpret variations (Figura 2024).
- Sedatives or anxiolytics may reduce exercise tolerance and increase the risk of falls.
Biological and Psychosocial Mechanisms
High-intensity endurance exercise stimulates corticostriatal plasticity and functional connectivity, which may slow the progression of motor deficits and improve movement control in Parkinson’s disease (Aguiar 2016; Luthra 2025). Brain imaging studies show both functional and structural changes (Johansson 2022).
HIT also reversed the expected decrease in dopamine transporter availability, leading to a significant increase in the substantia nigra and putamen (de Laat 2024). It also reversed the expected decrease in neuromelanin concentration in the substantia nigra (de Laat 2024). These results suggest an improvement in the functionality of remaining dopaminergic neurons through sufficiently sustained aerobic exercise.
Aerobic exercise increases blood levels of exerkinins. Exerkinins are bioactive substances synthesized and released during physical exercise that protect neuronal cells, according to in vitro studies and in vivo rodent models of Parkinson’s disease (Mitchell 2024). While this physical exercise does not cure the disease, it has been shown to be a powerful neuroprotective mechanism that helps slow the progression of the disease (Mitchell 2024). This NPI increases cerebral blood flow and neurotrophic factors (BDNF), supporting neuronal survival and motor learning. These mechanisms partly explain the reduction in motor symptoms observed following endurance training programs.
This NPI improves aerobic capacity, which increases functional reserve, enhances cardiorespiratory function, reduces fatigue, and promotes endurance in activities of daily living.
This NPI enhances motor control through repeated practice during supervised sessions that provide relevant feedback. It improves muscle performance (Rosenfeldt 2022), speed, and rhythmic timing during walking, as well as balance and motor synchronization.
Under professional supervision, this NPI promotes adherence to all treatments and fosters positive relationships with other healthcare professionals. This sense of being supported by a multidisciplinary team and a single point of contact boosts commitment to managing the disease; specialists refer to this as sustainable empowerment. *Recent analyses show more pronounced effects for intensive programs (HIIT or sustained aerobic training) than for light/moderate exercise, particularly regarding walking speed and overall motor function (Sena 2023).
Responding population
- Early to moderate stage, as patients retain sufficient motor reserve to tolerate the exertion caused by intensive training and benefit from it. A high-intensity endurance program is feasible for most patients with early-stage Parkinson’s disease, with equipment and instructional adjustments as needed (Schootemeijer 2022).
- Preserved cognitive function (memory/executive function) that allows patients to follow instructions, adhere to the program, and maintain adherence. Moderate cognitive impairment is not a contraindication in itself; it simply requires closer professional supervision.
- Low apathy, good motivation, and social support that encourage regular participation.
- Consider potentially limiting comorbidities (severe cardiorespiratory conditions, disabling musculoskeletal pain).
- Absence of severe orthostatic instability or uncontrolled anticoagulation.
Nonresponding population
- Advanced stage of the disease and significant functional limitations preventing the patient from reaching the target intensity.
- Severe cognitive impairment.
- Severe cardiorespiratory comorbidities (heart failure, unstable COPD).
- Severe autonomic dysfunction or symptomatic orthostatic hypotension.
- Disabling musculoskeletal pain or bone fragility.
- Severe and unstable dyskinesias.
- Major apathy, untreated depression, or low motivation.
- High-risk anticoagulation and history of bleeding.
- Lack of social or logistical support.
Participants
Duration
Sessions per week
Procedure
Participants use a heart rate monitor to record the intensity of all sessions. All sessions in weeks 1 through 2 are supervised on-site. Thereafter, participants come in at least once a month, when heart rate data is downloaded. Protocol adherence is monitored through monthly conference calls.
Assessment phase (1–2 sessions at the start of the program): 6-minute walk test, UPDRS-III, resting heart rate, MRC dyspnea scale with establishment of personalized goals, monitoring education (heart rate, RPE scale, tracking log).
Intensive supervised phase (1–8 weeks): Supervised sessions in the clinic, either individually or in small groups; weekly progression in duration and intensity; monitoring for warning signs (dyspnea, chest pain, syncope). Start at a moderate intensity of 60–65% of maximum heart rate [HRmax = 208 – (0.7 × age)] or a perceived exertion level of 12–13/20 on the Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale. Progress over the course of 8 weeks to a vigorous intensity (75 to 85% of HRmax or 14 to 17/20 on the RPE scale, when physiologically appropriate and safe).
Transition phase (8–16 weeks): Gradual reduction in supervision (1 supervised session for every 2 to 3 independent sessions), reinforcement of adherence strategies (weekly plan, reminders, app/pedometer).
Maintenance phase (17–26 weeks): Individualized program 4 times per week (30–45 min) with follow-up appointments at 1 month and then 3 months; periodic reassessments (6-minute walk test, adherence).
Components
Exercise intensity is increased during weeks 1 through 8 to reach the target levels. The target intensity is moderate to vigorous, ranging from 60 to 85% of maximum heart rate or 12 to 16 on the RPE scale, which reflects the perceived level of exertion. It is possible to alternate continuous exercise sessions with HIIT-style interval sessions depending on the patient’s tolerance and preference.
Subsequently, the target heart rate is maintained by adjusting the speed and/or incline if the exercise is performed on a treadmill. The perceived exertion scale is used to monitor exercise intensity in participants who have started taking chronotropic medications during the intervention.
Choose the patient’s preferred endurance activity and stick with it for 26 weeks to track progress. This activity should engage major muscle groups, such as brisk walking or walking uphill, running, cycling, swimming, rowing, or using an elliptical trainer (Parkinson’s Foundation 2025).
Equipment
- Heart rate monitor (belt or watch) to track intensity (target HR / %HRmax).
- Pulse oximeter to monitor oxygen saturation in patients with respiratory issues or those who are frail.
- Stopwatch.
- Pedometer.
- Measuring tape, RPE scale, 6-minute walk test sheet, tracking log. - First aid kit.
- Blood pressure monitor, defibrillator accessible according to local protocol, emergency contacts.
- Camera/computer/tablet with microphone and stable connection for remote supervision.
- Headset or external microphone for clear communication and audio/video monitoring.
- App or platform for session recording, HR tracking, and exercise reminders.
- Pedometer or cardio-GPS watch to track activity and motivation.
Location
Best implementation practices
- Adhering to minimum exercise doses is important to ensure benefits (Cui 2023).
- Break up the exercise into shorter sessions for certain patients with comorbidities (e.g., COPD).
- Standardize measurements (same distances, same parameters to track progress).
- Train the patient in self-monitoring before transitioning to independent exercise. For example, use a pedometer or heart rate monitor, a logbook to record HR/RPE and symptoms, and incorporate functional goals (walking to the market, climbing stairs).
- Have a recovery plan in place in case of an exacerbation.
- Some remote sessions at the patient’s home are feasible (van der Kolk 2018; van der Kolk 2019).
- A high-intensity interval training (HIIT) protocol is a possible alternative to the high-intensity continuous endurance protocol (Kathia 2024).
- The presence of a caregiver promotes persistence and thus the clinical effect.
- Professional supervision by a trained physical therapist ensures safety, individualized progress, and adherence.
- Promote motor learning.
- Quality of life and participation
- Improved quality of life: measurable improvements on quality-of-life questionnaires and in the ability to perform activities of daily living, with positive social and emotional outcomes.
- Functional transfer: the incorporation of specific exercises (dual-task exercises, training in real-world environments) promotes the transfer of training gains to daily tasks.
- Encourage group participation.
- Personalize guidance.
- While the intensity of endurance training is important, the volume and type of training are equally important (Panassollo 2024). The trainer must be able to help the patient step outside their “comfort zone,” in other words, go beyond submaximal thresholds.
Best practices for sustainability
- Reinforce successes with positive feedback.
- Encourage support from other patients and loved ones.
- Build confidence in one’s ability to succeed.
- Help patients use self-monitoring tools (heart rate monitor, smartwatch, app, etc.).
- Gradually reduce the frequency of supervision while ensuring that sessions are completed independently at the expected frequency.
- Provide practical solutions in case of exacerbations or relapses.
- Schedule follow-up sessions and “booster” sessions to adjust the exercise plan and maintain motivation.
Precautions
- Use the absence of warning signs during 4 weeks of independent exercise as a safety criterion.
- Review the patient’s medication regimen before starting (levodopa timing, antihypertensives, anticoagulants, psychotropic drugs, etc.).
- Request a preliminary medical evaluation (cardiopulmonary, ENT if necessary) and a stress test if risk factors are present.
- Have an initial supervision session with a trained physical therapist to adjust the intensity and ensure safety.
- Schedule sessions during the ON period whenever possible and ask the patient to bring their day/night self-assessment log.
- Measure blood pressure and heart rate before and after the session during the first week, then periodically thereafter.
- Train to recognize orthostatic hypotension, dizziness, dyskinesias, and other motor complications, and document them.
- Develop anti-freezing strategies (visual cues, rhythms, etc.).
- Take comorbidities into account (e.g., musculoskeletal, cardiorespiratory, and cognitive).
- Provide fluids in cases of orthostatic hypotension until rest periods for hydration are established, including after exercise.
- Stop immediately in the event of chest pain.
- Break up the exercise in cases of respiratory desaturation.
- Monitor for warning signs (excessive shortness of breath, chest pain, dizziness, pallor, hemoptysis, or hoarseness) to stop immediately and seek medical evaluation.
- Simplify instructions for individuals with cognitive impairments.
- Establish an emergency plan with a local protocol, medical contacts, and access to a defibrillator if necessary.
- Record assessments in an individual monitoring log (heart rate, RPE score, symptoms, 6-minute walk test performance, UPDRS-III, etc.).
- Train in Parkinson’s disease-specific INM.
Regulatory specification
This practice must be carried out within a healthcare organization, even if some sessions take place at home and others are supervised remotely.
Main Initiator
Qualification required
Adapted physical activity (APA) instructor working in a healthcare facility.
References
Rosenfeldt AB et al. Individuals With Parkinson Disease Are Adherent to a High-Intensity Community-Based Cycling Exercise Program. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2022 Apr 1;46(2):73-80. https://doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0000000000000370
Mechanistic study
Johansson ME et al. Aerobic Exercise Alters Brain Function and Structure in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Neurol. 2022 Feb;91(2):203-216. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.26291
Interventional studies
Schenkman M et al. Effect of High-Intensity Treadmill Exercise on Motor Symptoms in Patients With De Novo Parkinson Disease: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Feb 1;75(2):219-226. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3517
van der Kolk NM, de Vries NM, Kessels RPC, Joosten H, Zwinderman AH, Post B, Bloem BR. Effectiveness of home-based and remotely supervised aerobic exercise in Parkinson's disease: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2019 Nov;18(11):998-1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30285-6
Risk assessment studies
Rosenfeldt AB et al. Community-based high-intensity cycling improves disease symptoms in individuals with Parkinson's disease: A six-month pragmatic observational study. Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e6122-e6134. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.14049
Ernst M et al. Physical exercise for people with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 8;4(4):CD013856. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013856.pub3
Implementation in Europe
Di Martino S et al. Aerobic rehabilitation program for improving muscle function in Parkinson's disease. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2018;36(1):13-20. https://doi.org/10.3233/RNN-170738
Other publications
Aguiar AS Jr et al. Moderate-Intensity Physical Exercise Protects Against Experimental 6-Hydroxydopamine-Induced Hemiparkinsonism Through Nrf2-Antioxidant Response Element Pathway. Neurochem Res. 2016 Feb;41(1-2):64-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-015-1709-8
Alberts JL et al. The Universal Prescription for Parkinson's Disease: Exercise. J Parkinsons Dis. 2020;10(s1):S21-S27. https://doi.org/10.3233/JPD-202100
Arcolin I et al. Intensive cycle ergometer training improves gait speed and endurance in patients with Parkinson's disease: A comparison with treadmill training. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2016;34(1):125-38. https://doi.org/10.3233/RNN-150506
Cui W, Li D, Yue L, Xie J. The effects of exercise dose on patients with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Neurol. 2023 Nov;270(11):5327-5343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-11887-9
de Almeida FO et al. Effects of Endurance Training on Motor Signs of Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Med. 2022 Aug;52(8):1789-1815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01650-x
de Laat B et al. Intense exercise increases dopamine transporter and neuromelanin concentrations in the substantia nigra in Parkinson's disease. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2024 Feb 9;10(1):34. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-024-00641-1
Figura M et al. Impact of Physical Exercise on Levodopa Therapy Across Parkinson's Disease Stages. J Parkinsons Dis. 2024;14(5):1039-1049. https://doi.org/10.3233/JPD-230384
HAS. Prescription d’activité physique. Maladie de Parkinson. 2022. Saint-Denis la Plaine, Haute Autorité de Santé. https://www.has-sante.fr/upload/docs/application/pdf/2022-08/fiche_aps_parkinson_vf.pdf
Jansen AE et al. High intensity aerobic exercise improves bimanual coordination of grasping forces in Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2021 Jun;87:13-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2021.04.005
Kathia MM et al. High-intensity interval versus moderate-intensity continuous cycling training in Parkinson's disease: a randomized trial. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2024 Sep 1;137(3):603-615. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00219.2024
Kóra S et al. Effectiveness of High-Intensity Therapy in Rehabilitation of Parkinson’s Disease Patients. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(11):5890. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15115890
Langeskov-Christensen M et al. Exercise as medicine in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 16;95(11):1077-1088. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2023-332974
Luthra NS et al. Aerobic exercise-induced changes in fluid biomarkers in Parkinson's disease. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2025 Jul 1;11(1):190. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-025-01042-8
Miller Koop M et al. Mobility improves after high intensity aerobic exercise in individuals with Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Sci. 2019 Apr 15;399:187-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2019.02.031
Mitchell AK et al. Exercise, Neuroprotective Exerkines, and Parkinson's Disease: A Narrative Review. Biomolecules. 2024 Sep 30;14(10):1241. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom14101241
Movement Disorder Society Task Force on Rating Scales for Parkinson's Disease. The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS): status and recommendations. Mov Disord. 2003 Jul;18(7):738-50. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.10473 https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.10473
Panassollo TRB et al. Targeting exercise intensity and aerobic training to improve outcomes in Parkinson’s disease. Sport Sci Health. 2024;20:287–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-024-01165-0
Parkinson’s Fondation. Parkinson's Exercise Guidelines for Exercise Professionals. Parkinson’s Fondation, 2025. https://www.parkinson.org/sites/default/files/documents/Parkinsons-Exercise-Guidelines-1025.pdf?utm_source=copilot.com
Readinger J et al. Feasibility and longitudinal effects of repeated participation in an annual, brief and intense exercise program in individuals with Parkinson's disease: A case report. Physiother Theory Pract. 2022 Nov;38(13):3194-3205. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2021.1952667
Ridgel AL et al. Forced, not voluntary, exercise improves motor function in Parkinson's disease patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Jul-Aug;23(6):600-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968308328726
Rusch C et al. To restrict or not to restrict? Practical considerations for optimizing dietary protein interactions on levodopa absorption in Parkinson's disease. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2023 Jun 24;9(1):98. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-023-00541-w
Schootemeijer S et al. Clinical Trial Highlights - Aerobic Exercise for Parkinson's Disease. J Parkinsons Dis. 2022;12(8):2297-2306. https://doi.org/10.3233/JPD-229006
Sena IG et al. Feasibility and effect of high-intensity training on the progression of motor symptoms in adult individuals with Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2023 Nov 10;18(11):e0293357. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293357
Tsai CL et al. High-intensity interval vs. continuous moderate-intensity aerobic exercise for improving neurotransmitter level and neurocognitive performance in individuals with Parkinson's disease. Mental Health and Physical Activity. 2023;24: 100516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhpa.2023.100516
van der Kolk NM, de Vries NM, Penko AL, van der Vlugt M, Mulder AA, Post B, Alberts JL, Bloem BR. A remotely supervised home-based aerobic exercise programme is feasible for patients with Parkinson's disease: results of a small randomised feasibility trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018 Sep;89(9):1003-1005. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2017-315728
Wang J et al. Optimal dose and type of exercise to improve motor symptoms in adults with Parkinson's disease: A network meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport. 2025 Apr;28(4):282-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2025.01.003
Zhen K et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis on effects of aerobic exercise in people with Parkinson's disease. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2022 Oct 31;8(1):146. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-022-00418-4
Shulman LM, Gruber-Baldini AL, Anderson KE, Fishman PS, Reich SG, Weiner WJ. The clinically important difference on the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale. Arch Neurol. 2010 Jan;67(1):64-70. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2009.295
Experts who voted for the publication of this sheet
FRANCO Gianni , NINOT Grégory , MINET MathildeAuthor(s) of the Sheet
NPIS (comité scientifique)Revision Date : 14/04/2026
Version : V01
Download the sheet in PDF format
Submit a Suggestion for This Sheet:
Other sheets that might interest you
